Methodology

How AI predictions are produced on PredictTennisMatch — inputs, models, scoring, and known limitations.

Data inputs

Each match prediction starts from a structured snapshot built at SSG time:

  • Match metadata: start time, venue, surface, tournament, round.
  • Recent form for each player (last 5 matches, weighted by recency).
  • Head-to-head record between the two players over their last meetings.
  • Surface split — how each player performs on hard, clay, and grass.
  • Probability distributions over the match winner, total games, and over/under markets.

For background on this metric, see Elo rating.

Models

Predictions are produced by an ensemble of large language models that consume the structured inputs above and output a calibrated probability distribution plus a short reasoning paragraph.

No single model decides a prediction. The pipeline aggregates outputs across models and falls back to the best-calibrated source if a candidate disagrees beyond a configured threshold. For the underlying probability model, see probability theory.

Tournament scoring

When you submit predictions in tournaments your score is computed deterministically:

  • 1 point for a correct outcome (player 1 win / player 2 win).
  • 3 points for the exact final score.

Calibration

Prediction confidence is calibrated against historical results, not against the model's internal certainty. A 60% win probability means the model is right roughly 60% of the time on similarly framed matches — not that the favourite will win. For the statistical concept, see Calibration (statistics).

Known limitations

Tennis has irreducible variance. The model has no view on injuries, withdrawals, or last-minute fitness news unless those signals are present in its training inputs. Predictions are best read alongside current news, not as a replacement for it.

About us · Editorial policy